Template talk:Hugo Awards

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles

Science Fiction

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles

Definition of terms[edit]

What a "fanac" or "Pro's ac"? Both terms are unclear, and aren't defined in the Hugo Awards article. Can someone expand or replace them, to make the categories more clear? Thanks. --Anirvan 18:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These terms refer to "fan activity" (such a publishing a fanzine or organizing a science fiction convention) and "pro(fessional) activity" (such as writing a novel or painting a commercial book cover). - Dravecky (talk) 09:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Anyone interested in taking a stab at creating a Template:Hugo/Best novel to link the award winners together in a chronological manner like Template:Succession_box. See the succession template at bottom of Timothy V. Johnson for a live example of what I'm talking about. MrZaius^talk 08:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also look at Category:Succession templates. Note that I'd be happy to help. This would make the articles much easier to browse through, when examining a particular decade's literature. MrZaius^talk 12:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind - The Nebula people beat me to it. Dropping the thing they've been substituting into their articles into both Template:Hugo/Best novel & Template:Nebula/Best novel MrZaius^talk 12:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]